Snowblossom vs Mochimo

  • Mochimo $MCM

      • Programming Language: Written from Scratch in C
      • Consensus Mechanism: PoW (Proof of work)
      • Twitter: https://twitter.com/mochimocrypto
      • No ICO. Premine Details:
        • Bitcoin Parity Payment: Mochimo originally planned to conduct a BTC Airdrop with a 1 to 1 match, however this Airdrop was canceled due to the new regulatory environment.
        • Total Premine: 6.34% (4.76M MCM)
        • Dev Team Compensation Premine: 4.18% (3.2M MCM)
        • Other Premine (Managed By the Mochimo Foundation): 2.16% (1.56M MCM)
        • Genesis Block: June 25th, 2018
      • Post-Quantum security:
        • “Mochimo launched a functioning post-quantum secure blockchain-based cryptocurrency. This is achieved by using  XMSS+ with the WOTS+ variant of the Winternitz One-Time Signature proposed and proven by Andreas Hulsing in September 2017(EU’s PQCryptos approved algorithm).  The moshimo blockchain was built from ground up to use this algorithm.”
        • FX-C.com:
          • Mochimo team believe it takes 4-5 years for quantum computer to break ECDSA encrypted blockchain. This is unproven. Quamtum computing risk do not exist in any meaningful way until QCs are faster than electronic computers. We don't know whether high qubit quantum computer is possible yet, it may take 10-20 years, or just impossible.  
          • In order to support this quantum resistant algorithm from PQCryptos,  Mochimo team have to build the blockchain from scratch.  But we won't know how well it will work because we won't have high qubit quantum computers for testing for many years. If that algorithm fails, what can mochimo do?  According to Mochimo lead developer:  “we're going to be a dual-algo chain soon.so you'll send a tx from your algorithm-a address to your algorithm-b address on the same blockchain. it's not a problem”  This is not yet proven until it's done.
          • Currently compared to mochimo, snowblossom is in a much better position, because they are much more flexible in the algorithms they can support in the long term.
      • Scalabliliy:
        • “Mochimo have solved network scalability issues permanently. Blocks stay small while substantially increasing TX speed using ChainCrunch™,  Mochimo's proprietary algorithm. Users can set up a full working node in minutes that compresses the blockchain into a small % of the historical block chain. Because of ChainCrunch short-term and long-term scaling is not a problem for Mochimo.(scaling from existing IK TPS to 20K TPS within 6.75 years);”
        • FX-C.com:  Pascalcoin's ‘Safebox' solved scalabiltiy issues 2 years earlier than mochimo's Chaincrunch.
          • Similarity: Both are scaling solutions. Both try to reduce chain size.
          • Difference: Pascalcoin/Safebox is open source software(This means everyone can see how it works and learn from it.)  ChainCrunch is still a pending patent, So, for now it's unproven, compared to pascalcoin. Because mochimo team is applying a patent for it when we already have pascalcoin, Chaincruch may have completely different design.
      • Decentralization:
        • “Trigg’s Algorithm ensures fixed mining difficulty, random node selection, fixed TX fees, and a AI-enhanced load balancer that writes a unique “haiku” for every block.”
        • FX-C.com:  Snowblossom's ASIC resistance design is significantly better than Mochimo's ‘Trigg Algorithm', because there's risk that  FPGAs and ASICs will be developed for MCM.
      • Traded on: vinex.network
      • Community:

Leave a Reply